<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DeckerD: Drew&#039;s Personal Corner of the Web &#187; Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deckerd.com/tag/design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deckerd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 20:22:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Case Project: Validating Google Site-Flavored</title>
		<link>http://www.deckerd.com/core/validate-google-site-flavored/</link>
		<comments>http://www.deckerd.com/core/validate-google-site-flavored/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 01:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XHTML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deckerd.com/validate-google-site-flavored/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="prepend-1 append-1 featuredTitle">According to Google, Google Site-Flavored's search delivers web search results that are customized to individual websites. The only problem with the output of their code is messy, very messy. Let's fix this and make it more standards compliant. I will always hold Google's algorithms and services very high. They offer many free searches and services that, by far, out-do other companies; not to mention that they have created standards that have brought other companies (Microsoft and Yahoo! to <a href="http://www.deckerd.com/core/validate-google-site-flavored/">Read More &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deckerd.com/core/validate-google-site-flavored/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>XFrames: XHTML Frames?</title>
		<link>http://www.deckerd.com/core/xframes-draft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.deckerd.com/core/xframes-draft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 02:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XHTML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XHTML 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deckerd.com/xframes-draft/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="prepend-1 append-1 featuredTitle">A friend of mine was telling me how much he just, loves IFrames. So much, that an article I wrote earlier in my life still hasn't persuaded him to change his mind. For people like him, I have written an article just for you! Seems like the W3C has a heart for you; XFrames, the possible new frames for the upcoming XHTML 2.0. NOTE: XFrames is a part of a working draft and is still under development of this writing. So all examples will NOT work on a browser. Article was originally written in <a href="http://www.deckerd.com/core/xframes-draft/">Read More &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deckerd.com/core/xframes-draft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
